In the comments, please help find as many reasons or anomalies why this is poor advice (and then please reply and critique the critiquing).2 comments so far, add yours ▶
Today the guys over at Google released their newest parry against Apple’s dominance by launching Google Fit. I’m glad that they’ve made this move to combat the perceived potential monopoly of the Apple HealthKit – as it seems that many people are getting excited about the benefits of a centralised record of a person’s physical activities.
My favourite fitness app – Strava
As you’ll see from the little widget on the side of the blog, I am a big fan of Strava. Yes, it’s got a bit of a bad reputation for male ‘KOMs’ (King of the Mountains) trying to better each other on dangerous stretches of road, and is a little macho-istic in its purpose – but the real benefit for me is to chart and see my progress over the time that I’ve been using it. Only in the last few weeks have my commutes started becoming ‘achievement free’ – meaning that I’m no longer simply improving my performance on a weekly basis through chugging away on my commute – or that I’ve hit the ‘safe’ limit for speeding around central London through rush hour.
Strava & Veloviewer – a match made in heaven.
It’s neat though, because I came across a tool called Veloviewer.com which can interact with the Strava API and pull out all my ride data, and then provide better analysis and graphing of my progress. Want to see my performance on a certain segment over the past 2 years? Sure. They even start by mirroring the privacy settings of what I’ve kept on Strava. Perfect.
Twitter & Twitpic – the lesson.
However, they’re developing against a moving target. There’s nothing stopping Strava from seeing how Veloviewer are using the Strava API, copying their efforts and then closing it down*. Twitter’s API during it’s boom years was a major incentive for companies like TweetDeck, twitpic & Instagram to all grab onto the shirt-tails and using the twitter API boost their own revenues, however, when Twitter decided to expand and compete directly with them, it was easy to shut down the API and make more advanced functionality a ‘premium’ service.
So, Google Fit.
What Google Fit does, is bring together that fitness data under one, independent* source – that will allow a greater level of trust and compatibility between apps like Strava and Veloviewer. Garmin recently saw the light at the end of the tunnel and opened up their ‘Garmin Connect’ software to sync data in and out with some key mobile fitness apps – but separating the data from the devices has got to be the ultimate aim in usability. Sites like veloviewer can leverage the functionality of the GoogleFit REST API, whereas Android apps themselves can use the ‘Android’ interface to get data in and out of the datastore.
What’s the problem?
The problem is that it’s another bit of data that is fairly personal that I’m giving to Google. Now, Google give me a load of stuff for ‘free’ – and in return I get neat functionality. Want to track whether my girlfriend is going to beat me home to make dinner – yep; check. I can do it. The problem I’ve got is the ‘visibility’ of what Google store on me. When Google Latitude first came out, it was immediately obvious where the data points were gathered from, and though the interfaces were pretty ugly, you could navigate and quite easily see things like your location history. The difference in the most modern iteration is that the ‘gateway’ for signing yourself up into this data collection exercise is no longer contextualised. You buy an Android phone and turn on location services (otherwise people have actually got to use orienteering skills to use Google maps, rather than just follow the blue dot!), and Boom! Now google did react quite positively to concerns about this, so when you google ‘Location History’ you can see the following link: https://maps.google.co.uk/locationhistory/ – but many people are still freaked out by this.
So, when an interface like Google Fit comes along, it scares me a bit
It’s so bloody simple it doesn’t really tell me what’s being stored. At the moment I’ll put this down to ‘freshness’ and hopefully Google will take the same path that they did with location history – but seeing my data stash (being able to import/export from it too) is key functionality that I expect to be developed either by a third party using the Google API – or by Google themselves.
The positive is that they’ve published a paragraph called ‘Responsible use of Google Fit‘ – so at least they’re giving it plenty of thought from the off.
I look forward to seeing the direction this takes, and hopefully more apps like Veloviewer will be able to grow based on today’s announcement. It’ll be interesting to see how Google manage to compete with Apple’s HealthKit – with Apple clearly taking the initiative on NFC (despite being years late to the party) by proactively curating a network of corporate agreements to get their payment systems integrated with the new ApplePay, versus Google’s passive actions waiting for Contactless, and then NFC to take off organically.
*I have no idea what the incentives of the Strava developers are re: veloviewer, but at the moment it’s all looking rosy from the outside.Leave the first comment ▶
Cycling around the lanes of East Sussex just south of Tunbridge Wells last weekend, I had a bit of a tumble. It wasn’t a wild crash, but due to the unfortunate mix of a newly serviced bike and a few wet leaves on the floor, my confidence in the grip of my tyres and the efficacy of my brakes turned out to be a little too high. I was cycling from Brightling to Burwash when my overconfidence led to a 10 meter skid and me left dangling upside down in a hedge after flying straight over the top of my handlebars. Luckily there were no cars coming the other way, but three lovely motorists did decide to stop to make sure I was ok.
I’ve loved my Trek 1.5 since getting in as a birthday present back in March 2012. A sleek white racer, it was the first ‘road bike’ I’ve owned. I did once borrow my Granddad’s Dawes roadies for a few months back in 2003, but technology appears to have massively improved since the 70s. I love the flat, I love going up hills, but sometimes going downhill can feel a little.. hairy.
About 14 months ago I was training for the etape pennines up north of Buxton, Derbyshire. I’d spent quite a bit of my youth up near Edale and Mam Tor, and with my sister up at University in Buxton, figured it would be a great place to get some hill training in before the etape. It was – but cycling down Winnat’s Pass left me feeling pretty uncomfortable about descending at speed. Whenever I applied the brakes it simply felt like the bike was squirming and bending underneath me; not wanting to follow the direction I was guiding it, but behaving like an angry bull trying to throw the rider. It was not a pleasant experience.
A few weeks later I was doing the BHF’s Heart of England ride with my family, when I asked my Dad if I could borrow his Madone 3.1 for the ride. A carbon fibre bike, it was definitely lighter than mine, but I didn’t expect the braking so be so much more comfortable. The Madone comes with a mix of 105 and SRAM components, and it was an absolute dream to ride. Gone was the horrible binary braking experienced on my 1.5, and suddenly I felt in control and far more confident about how the bike would behave at speed downhill.
I begrudgingly gave the Madone back to Dad once I’d finished the etape (3 months later, but who’s counting…) – and since then have been looking around at other bikes to work out whether it’s time to take the plunge and upgrade the 1.5, or whether some small componentry upgrades would help ‘fix’ my problem. It’s taken a while, but for now I’ve decided to upgrade the non-branded brake calipers on the bike to some simple Tiagra ones. I have no frame of reference or comparison as to the difference they may make – but I hope to feedback what I find out.Leave the first comment ▶
Disclaimer: Forgive me for the ramble. I started this blog off on quite a separate topic, and in doing so found myself on quite a different train of thought.. If you do end up staying with me to the end, I’d really appreciate reading your comments so I can start to formulate a more cohesive account of what we are trying to say.
One of the most challenging jobs I consider is the role of technical Sales. I’ve been involved in quite a few software businesses where the salesperson has to have a full grasp of not just the company’s immediate offering, but how it may strategically evolve to become the right choice for the customer.
Ironically there is a parallel here with car industry. Companies like Lucas used to develop car headlamps (their premium models branded “King of the Road”) and other specialist car parts. I have a vague recollection of being on holiday in the West of France with my family when the Vauxhall Frontera was relaunched with a fundamentally different rear suspension system, dramatically improving the car. From the AA:
“Semi-elliptic rear leaf springs gave these early models an unrefined ride, but things changed for the better in April 1995 with the introduction of a coil-sprung rear axle, plus better brakes and improved rear door opening with lifting glass.”
The real crux here is that when there is a major leap forward in technology or innovation, there is a transitional period where the customers who don’t understand the technology need to have a technical salesperson explain the benefits. Once the technology is bedded in, there is less of a need for the technical sales as the technology has become, if not ubiquitous, at least understood in the realm in which it is used.
For digital communications, this same phenomenon appears to have occurred. In the late 90s and early 00s digital was about having an online presence; it then became the focus of communications experts to align the online presence with the offline marketing plans. Following on from this we’ve seen the social media boom, and now marketing departments are starting to understand what social networks are, their advantages and drawbacks, and aligning all their messaging accordingly.
It seems to me that the next jump is going to be another technical one. With the imminent introduction of browser-to-browser communication, what are the innovations or restrictions that such technology may carry? Having recently read (and commented on) @Documentally’s piece on the ‘Perfect Prison‘ – what could the internet look like in another 5 years?
In the last 200 years the majority of the Western World has been fortunate. We’ve been able to align the progress of time with what feels like improvement. This story, perpetuated by the media and by ideas such as “Moore’s Law” has made us believe that through the simple passage of time things will get better*. However, could the real story be that, as a society, we are starting to regress?
I am a huge fan of Hans Rosling, though his talks on the wealth of nations in comparison to life expectancy over the last 200 years aligns more with the first story than the latter. In them, however, you’ll see anomalies that don’t match the overall story are ignored. In the disclaimer there’s also the admission that due to the pure volume and scarcity of data, some of it has been ‘normalised’ and ‘interpolated’ to enable its use in the chart.
One of the most intriguing articles I read at the end of 2013 (it was actually published in Feb 2012) was on against TED. I’ve always had a soft spot for TED. I used to spend afternoons at college with a friend pinging each other TED talks. They were a ‘cool’ glimpse into what would be possible in the future. Intelligent role models taking time to share their ideas in a way that we could easily digest. The most intriguing part of the criticism for me was the following paragraph:
At TED, “everyone is Steve Jobs” and every idea is treated like an iPad. The conferences have come to resemble religious meetings and the TED talks techno-spiritual sermons, pushing an evangelical, cultish attitude toward “the new ideas that will change the world.” Everything becomes “magical” and “inspirational.” In just the top-ten most-viewed TED talks, we get the messages of “inspiration,” “astonishment,” “insight,” “mathmagic” and the “thrilling potential of SixthSense technology”! The ideas most popular are those that pander to a metaphysical, magical portrayal of the role of technology in the world.
Technology is what we make of it. As a technologist myself, I’m sometimes the awe of my friends when they come round and see that I’ve got my heating system graphing hourly electricity usage, and I can set my alarm in the morning to not bother turning the hot water on because I know I’ll be showering at work after cycling in. This isn’t mystical, nor is it a ‘great leap forward’ – it’s actually using five year old technology in a way that the original inventor did not intend.
Behind all the technology that we’re currently using is an inventor that has set the technology up and is manipulating it in some way. Sometimes it’s obvious and we are fully aware of the manipulation and carry on; other times it’s more subtle. I think the big change over the next few years will be algorithms that are not used simply to manipulate, but to identify where this manipulation fails and find ways of making it work. We will be made redundant from our roles as technical salespeople, as people think they understand how the technology works and can make the decisions themselves, but with the oversimplification of the technologies so ‘everyone can understand it’ comes a price. The price, in this case, is the freedom to choose.Comments Off
The Galaxy Note 2 – the latest smartphone / tablet from Samsung – is without a doubt the finest phone I’ve ever used. For some the size and included stylus are a little off putting but for me it’s the ideal step up from my Galaxy S2.
The Galaxy S2 was a really slim and attractive phone and despite the increase in size this is a tradition the Note 2 continues in style. In order to protect my S2 I went for a large two layer case comprised of a rubber inner layer and a hardened plastic shell; this worked wonders and to this day it hasn’t sustained any major damage. However this added protection really added to the overall size of the phone and made it quite bulky to hold.
With my Note 2 I was offered a different and more innovative choice; a Tech 21 Impact Snap case from Mobile Fun. What sets this unusually thin hard plastic case apart is the progression from a thick layer of rubber or silicone to thin orange strips of a smart substance called D3O. These line the inside edges of the case and whilst they feel soft to the touch, on impact the material hardens to absorb the force that would otherwise be transferred to the handset.
The case fits tightly and has cutouts where required, including a generous opening for Samsung’s S-Pen stylus which I found actually helped me remove it from the phone more easily. There is also a slight lip over the front of the phone which ensures that should the phone land face down the screen will not directly impact the ground..
If I were to suggest a way of improving the protection offered by the Tech 21 Impact Snap case it would be by pairing it with a Galaxy Note 2 Screen Protector just to keep that 5.5″ screen safe and scratch free.Leave the first comment ▶
When I first came across Ubuntu, I fell in love with the philosophy.
I am who I am, because you are who you are.
Having studied Psychology, the ‘person in social psychology’ is an extremely complex issue. When you ask a person to define ‘who they are’ – they very often describe social relationships. “I’m a rugby player” describes a person, because we can then draw on the social norms associated with rugby players, drinking, fitness, fairness and camaraderie.
In our consumerist society, the western adoption of ubuntu would probably go along the lines of:
“I am who I am because I’m better than him”
In the race to the top, in constantly looking as individuals to better ourselves, the first thing that breaks is community. The social fabric of communities that helped build up the work ethic in the early development of the industrial revolution has been reversed, when now the paradigm is to try and better oneself in comparison to one’s peers.
The problem with this approach is that it breaks community. Instead of looking for shared prosperity, we are looking to break it. The recession of 2009 is evidence that such an approach is not sustainable, nor what people would actually want. I can assert with confidence that the majority of people would be uneasy to say all they want to do is be ‘better than their neighbours’.
The root of the problem then lies in the social system, which is manipulating our individual psychology for prosperity. We are told by adverts to want the next big thing, we need to get bigger houses, more TVs, the latest iPad.
The good news, for me, is that it is the system that is manipulating the individual, rather than an inherent belief in an individual to want to better their peers. The vast majority of people look to share their prosperity with their friends, family and future offspring. There are other factors involved with the status quo, but I will not go into them in this post.
So if we go back to the root, if we look carefully at how we behave. Think about the pound that you spend; the time you use up. It is possible to turn the system on it’s head. I’m lucky enough to have been involved in the ‘Open Source’ movement – this is moving away from software being regarded solely in terms of monetary value, and instead being given a social value. We exchange it for free, so that each of us may have a more prosperous resource from which to work.
Certainly, there are more challenges to be faced when using the same structures to share material goods, but these are not insurmountable. I’m sure anyone that’s worked in retail will be fully aware of the mark-up put on products. If buying through a third party supplier, it’s possible for the end distributor to make far more money on ‘mark-up’ that was earned by the manufacturer. I’d argue that the main reason for this is that the ‘buffer’ between the distributor and manufacturer is large enough for it not to have to play on the conscience of the distributor. If we move to a more local economy, then I’d suggest that these discrepancies in ‘value’ versus ‘price’ would be much narrower.Leave the first comment ▶